For the Visitation: E.L. Mascall on the Incarnation and the Virgin Zachary Guiliano May 31, 2016 Catechesis, Church of England, Commentary, Liturgy, Ressourcement From time to time on this blog, I have provided selections from the Church Fathers for major feasts of the Christian year (e.g., see here, and here). I have also translated various Latin texts that are not widely available (see here for one on the Incarnation from Pseudo-Maximus of Turin, and here for one on the Eucharist from Rabanus Maurus). This is not a habit I intend to break. But, a couple of weeks ago, I made mention of The Customary of Our Lady of Walsingham: Daily Prayer for the Ordinariate, which provides readings from the Anglican tradition for most of the major feasts and Sundays of the year. I thought I would intersperse these into my normal offerings. My hope is that this occasional attention drawn to The Customary will aid in its reception in the English-speaking world, as the resource’s authors have hoped. It will also lift up some treasures from the Anglican tradition (or medieval English, Welsh, and Scottish traditions), which are consonant with broader Catholic theology and especially with the doctrine taught by the contemporary Roman Catholic magisterium. So, here is the reading assigned in The Customary for today’s feast, the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary to Elizabeth: E.L. Mascall, “Theotokos: The Place of Mary in the Work of Salvation,” in The Blessed Virgin Mary. Essays by Anglican Writers, ed. by E.L. Mascall and H.S. Box (Darton, Longman, and Todd, 1963), pp. 23-25. Advertisement I think you’ll find it a profound reflection on Marian theology and on the theology of the Incarnation. It is bursting with insights from St. Leo and St. Augustine. (In a few instances, I’ve abbreviated the selection slightly, added some emphases, and added some paragraph breaks.) A reading from the writings of Eric Lionel Mascall Mary is our mother, because we are members of her Son, because we have, not just metaphorically, but really, been adopted into him. By our baptism we have been incorporated into the human nature which he took from her and which still continues to exists in its ascended glory. If Christ had ceased to be man at his ascension — and it is to be feared that only too many Christians unreflectively assume that he did — then Mary would have ceased to be his mother, our incorporation into him would be a mere fiction, and so would our relation to him. But the Catholic doctrine of the Incarnation declares that the eternal Son of God, who at one moment in the world’s history took human nature in the womb of Blessed Mary, is, in that human nature, man for evermore. […] Mary is the mother of Jesus and of those who are incorporated into him, the mother of the Church which is his Mystical Body and which, because a man and his bride are one flesh, is also Christ’s bride. The Incarnation took place at the Annunciation, when in response to Mary’s Fiat, the Word was made very man in her womb. But the further fact of her relation to the Church and its members had to wait for the Ascension and for the descent of the Spirit at Pentecost, when the Church, whose archetypal substance already existed in the manhood of Jesus, was fully and visibly constituted in power. In the Ascension the Lord’s human nature was withdrawn from human sight and touch. From then until Pentecost the apostolic group was the Church in expectancy and potentiality, awaiting its activation by the Spirit and the communication to it of the full reality of Christ’s manhood. When the Spirit descended in tongues of fire, it was to make the waiting group into the mystical Body of Christ in a way analogous to that in which the descent of the Spirit upon Mary at her Annunciation had formed the natural body of Christ in her womb. Nevertheless, although the Mystical Body came into being by this new descent of the Spirit, there was not a new incarnation, Christ was not becoming man a second time, he was not assuming a new nature; the human nature which he had taken from his mother, in which he had died for our sins and risen again for our justification, was being made present under a new mode. There are not, strictly speaking, two bodies of Christ, a natural and a mystical, but one body of Christ which is manifested in two forms. Nor does the story end here, for that part of the Mystical Body which is on earth needs to be continually nourished and sustained, as Christ’s natural body did before its glorification. It is through the Eucharistic Body of the Blessed Sacrament that this takes place. Here again, there is not a new incarnation, but in the Eucharist the human nature which Christ took from his mother is made present in yet another form, a form through which that part of the Mystical Body which is still in via on earth is repeatedly sustained and renewed. In all these modes of manifestation, the human nature of Christ is the human nature which he took from Mary. The descent of the Holy Spirit on Mary at the Annunciation first formed it, the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles at Pentecost released it, so to speak, in the world as the Mystical Body of the Church, and the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Eucharistic elements brings it to us as the Sacramental Body. But in all these manifestations and expressions, it is one and the same Body, the Body which was formed in Mary’s womb, and so when we return from the Altar, having received the sacramental Body of Christ and having thereby been received more firmly into his Mystical Body, we can say with a new emphasis the words that, in the Genesis story, Adam said after he had tasted the food given him by the first Eve: ‘The woman gave me, and I did eat’ (Gen 3:12). For it is the very body, the human nature, which Christ took from his mother, on which we are fed in the Holy Eucharist. And Jesus and his members are one Body, the Whole Christ, and Mary is his mother and theirs. The Collect from The Customary O God, who didst lead the Blessed Virgin Mary to visit Elizabeth, to their exceeding joy and comfort: grant unto they people, that as Mary did rejoice to be called the Mother of the Lord, so, by her intercession, they may ever rejoice to believe the incarnation of thine only-begotten Son; to whom with thee and the Holy Spirit be all honour and glory, world without end Dr. Zachary Guiliano is an associate editor at The Living Church, and an ordinand in the Diocese of Ely. His other posts are here. The featured image is a stained glass from Magdalene College, Cambridge. The photo was taken by Fr. Lawrence Lew, OP, and is licensed under Creative Commons. Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYour email address will not be published.CommentName* Email* Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Δ This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.